My professors say my essays are too formal and lack a personal touch. I want to learn how to humanize my academic writing and connect better with readers, but I’m not sure where to start. Any tips or examples would really help.
Ah, the ol’ “your essays are too formal and robotic” complaint. Classic. Professors love to toss that out when they want you to “relate” or “sound authentic.” Translation? Stop sounding like you copied your essay from a textbook, but don’t get so friendly they think you wrote it as a text message. It’s a fine line, but here’s the cheat sheet:
- Tone it Down: You don’t have to use words like “therefore” and “henceforth” in every other line. Sometimes “but” works just as well as “however.”
- Sprinkle Personality: Use first person (“I argue that…,” “In my experience…”) if your discipline allows. Just don’t make it all about you—stay on topic.
- Tell a Story: A little anecdote to open your intro or give context to an argument can make your essay actually enjoyable (yeah, I said it).
- Varied Sentences: Mix those long convoluted sentences with short punchy ones. Just. Like. That.
- Make Connections: Relate your ideas to real-world experiences, pop culture, or common student struggles. Your reader is human—remind them you are, too.
- Ask Questions: Throw in a rhetorical question or two. Keeps readers awake (hopefully).
Example:
Stuffy: “The underlying principle guiding this argument is the fundamental necessity of equitable distribution.”
Human: “Let’s face it: sharing isn’t just for kindergartners. If resources are hoarded, everyone loses out.”
If you really wanna amp up the human touch, try making your writing sound more naturally human here. Some tools out there will let you run your essay through and get rid of that rigid, robotic vibe—super handy if you’re in a hurry and not feeling the muse.
Finally: It’s about balance. You don’t want to write like you’re sending memes to your buddy, but injecting a little warmth, a dash of you, and dialing back super-formal phrasing can go a loooong way. Also, occassional typos (like “occasional” there) make you real, right? Or just proofread, your call!
Honestly, the whole “make your essay sound more human” push can be a little confusing, especially when you’re used to cranking out perfectly formatted, jargon-padded sentences that should make you sound smart (but apparently, just make you sound like a robot). I get where @waldgeist is coming from—dialing down the big words, showing some personality—but I’ll play devil’s advocate here: too informal, and some profs will definitely ding you for not sounding “academic” enough. Classic academic catch-22.
So here’s a different spin: focus on clarity and engagement over “personality.” Sometimes, just making your writing clear and direct is what makes it most human—not necessarily anecdotes or first-person tangents. Try this: before you submit, read your essay out loud. If you trip over a sentence, it’s probably too stiff. If your argument takes three paragraphs to get to the point, chop it.
Instead of opening with a personal story (which can feel forced if it’s not you), why not use vivid examples or analogies? E.g., “Trying to solve this issue without addressing root causes is like patching a leaky boat with chewing gum.” Instantly more relatable, no “I think” required.
A note about structure: Mix things up. But don’t go overboard with sentence fragments—it can look lazy if not balanced right. And PLEASE avoid rhetorical questions if you can’t answer them right away; otherwise it just reads like procrastination wrapped up as style.
If you want a safety net, check out Clever Ai Humanizer. Run your draft through it and see how it switches up the tone while keeping it academic but readable. That can be a game-changer when you’re not sure where your voice lands on the “robotic-human” spectrum.
And if you want even more ideas, I found this awesome list of top free tools to make your writing sound more authentic—helped me figure out my style, honestly.
Oh, one last thing: professors are just people. Some love a little humor, others hate it and want their essays bone-dry. The “personal touch” can mean totally different things depending on who’s grading, so maybe (radical idea) ask your prof for an example of what they like. Saves a lot of guesswork.
2 Likes
Let’s just cut to it—writing academic essays that don’t sound like a mannequin reciting a dictionary is a challenge, but not a mystery. I’ve skimmed through @viaggiatoresolare and @waldgeist’s takes and, honestly, everyone’s circling the same drain: don’t bore your reader, but don’t write like you’re Snapchatting your group chat. But sometimes, injecting personality isn’t just about swapping “thus” for “so.” It’s more about the way you frame your analysis.
Here’s a real fix: build your essay like you’re crafting an argument you’d use to win over a skeptic friend—think of the reader as someone you want to convince, not impress. That’s the core of humanized writing.
Quick disagrees:
- Anecdotes are hit or miss—some essays seriously don’t need the “once, in my math class” treatment and it feels shoehorned. Use them only if it genuinely strengthens your point.
- Rhetorical questions? Meh. Too many and you sound like you’re in a debate club, not doing real scholarship.
- Reading out loud is solid but better if you can get a buddy to read your paper and just ask, “Did you glaze over anywhere?” That’s your red flag zone.
For a practical boost, the Clever Ai Humanizer is legit for tweaking awkward, overly formal phrases into something smoother. It’s not magic (and sometimes the rewording can be a hair too chill for strict professors), but it’s super handy when you hit that “argh, this just sounds weird” block. Pros: fast, easy interface, makes bland sentences pop. Cons: on the rare occasion, it’ll oversimplify or introduce phrasing that’s a bit too casual—you’ll need to rein that in for super-formal assignments.
Competitor tools like the ones mentioned by @viaggiatoresolare and @waldgeist are decent, but for the seamless “academic+human” blend, Clever Ai Humanizer lands a good balance.
Bottom line: clarity > personality, but a relatable tone always wins. Edit like you’re slicing bread—trim the crust but keep what’s hearty. Overthink less, connect more.